U.S. Bank, N.A. Courts have held that a mortgagee's noncompliance can be asserted as an affirmative defense or an equitable defense to a judicial-foreclosure action. " For example, as the district court implicitly recognized, at that stage the mortgagee would not have incurred substantial attorneys' fees and costs so that Smith's initial offer to pay the debt would have been sufficient to cover the mortgage deficiency. It is well-established that under Florida law the five yearstatute of limitationsgoverningforeclosureactions does not otherwise affect the validity or enforceability of a lien created by a mortgage. Because of this, courts also require the plaintiff show it has rights to enforce the note in order to prevail under the first count of the foreclosure lawsuit. However, if the mortgagor has been denied coverage under the policy, monies received by the mortgagee do not inure to the benefit of the mortgagor and thus, the mortgagor will not be entitled to an offset for monies paid to the mortgagee. Caraccia v. U.S. Bank, 185 So. Cart Acknowledging (now) their status as general creditors only, appellants contend that they have a right to attack the distribution of the mortgage foreclosure proceeds notwithstanding their lack of interest in the mortgageres. If the foreclosing party failed to follow the procedures required by state law, you can ask the court to dismiss the case. Reduction in the loan balance and possible damages. The Rules permit service upon a competent adult by leaving a copy of it "at the individuals dwelling house or usual place of abode with some person of suitable age and discretion then residing therein . " M.R. 2013), https://casetext.com/case/pfeifer-v-countrywide-home-loans-2. The process of challenging a foreclosure varies based on whether the foreclosure is judicial or non-judicial. In other words, the record fails to show any prejudice to the Bank. The court used Parkard Bell Elecs. Liberty Bank v. New London, LP, 2007 Ct. Sup. See id. Moreover, if Smith had received notice prior to the initial filing of the complaint, as required by 41 Pa.Stat.Ann. A motion to dismiss can be presented based on failure to join indispensable parties. How would someone spot this foreclosure defense in their own situation? (2) The mortgaged property is not within 200 miles of the mortgagee, its servicer, or a branch office of either. 1998). A mechanics lien foreclosure was filed against the property and its owners, in which the Bank was made a party to. Wisconsin Brick did no act which was not attributable to its position as a junior mortgagee in the foreclosure actions and specifically it did not sign the stipulation with the other mortgagees agreeing to a sale free and clear of its lien and waiving its right of redemption. Corp v Theseus, Inc as justification to its decision as this case determined that a mechanics lien was not valid due to the owner of six lots no being named in foreclosure proceedings. Defenses include TILA, HOEPA, RESPA, FDCPA, FCRA and more. Therefore, although the defect in execution was not apparent on the face of the instrument, the court nonetheless held that the defect rendered the mortgage "ineffective as against subsequent creditors." 12(b)(6), in making futility determinations, the court must limit itself to the allegations in the complaint, as well as to any documents attached to the complaint as exhibits or incorporated by reference." The court held that Coxson's acts were defensive because they were in response to the defendants' proof of claim filed in the bankruptcy court. In other states, foreclosures typically happen outside of court (nonjudicial foreclosures), and you have no automatic means to mount a legal challenge. Ulico Cas. The debt or cause of action shall be briefly stated in the judgment, or in a writing to be filed as pleadings in other actions. 23 Legal Defenses To Foreclosure Publisher: CreateSpace 885 (1939). 40; ECF No. "Generally in the absence of some element of estoppel or such extraordinary circumstances as would render inequitable the enforcement of petitioners' right after a delay, laches will not bar a suit short of the period set forth in the limitation statute. ISBN-13: 9781438278193. . What Are Federal Mortgage Servicing Laws? 254, 778 A.2d 529 (N.J. Super. Huntington Cont'l Townhouse Ass'n, Inc. v. Miner, 230 Cal.App.4th 590, 179 Cal. The central element is intent, which must be unequivocally manifested. Thompson v. Bank of Am. Ct. App. Waiveris based upon a species of the principle ofestoppeland where applicable it will be enforced as theestoppelwould be enforced . In re Gorman , 495 B.R. Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information, Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information. On the undisputed facts presented, we hold that Fireman's Fund is not precluded by AS 34.20.100 (1990) from satisfying its outstanding debt from available insurance proceeds even though it purchased the fire-damaged property at its own foreclosure sale. 2005) ("Thelimitationsperiod provided in section 95.11(2)(c) does not affect the life of the lien or extinguish the debt; it merely precludes an action to collect the debt after five years. The court uses Wheat v Brown as precedent, which determined that "a mortgage foreclosure action does not terminate a lease unless the lessee is made party to that action." But since the foreclosure crisis and great recession, many homeowners have successfully challenged foreclosure actions. A tort of wrongful foreclosure satisfies the basic factors for finding a tort duty enunciated in Biakanja v. Irving (1958) 49 Cal.2d 647, 650651, 320 P.2d 16. Souza v. Bank of Am., Nat'l Ass'n, CIVIL NO. Your use of this website constitutes acceptance of the Terms of Use, Supplemental Terms, Privacy Policy and Cookie Policy. Plaintiffs allege they detrimentally relied on Chase's promise to permanently modify their loan by repeatedly contacting Chase, by repeatedly preparing documents at Chase's request, by discontinuing efforts to pursue a refinance from other financial institutions or to pursue other means of avoiding foreclosure, and by losing their home and making it unlikely they could purchase another one. Despite the contingent, inchoate nature of a dower interest prior to the owner-spouse's death, a judicial sale of the property during the owner-spouse's lifetime does not vitiate the other spouse's dower interest. at 174. Hamrick v. Safe Auto Ins. Late fees can only be assessed in the amount specifically authorized by the loan contract. Most importantly, if you took out your mortgage before you were on active duty, your foreclosure must happen in court even if foreclosures in your state customarily occur outside of court (nonjudicial foreclosures), unless the servicer gets a waiver from you. Accordingly, plaintiff's failure either to attach or to set out verbatim the terms of the contract was not fatal to his breach of contract cause of action. ; and (3) be payable on demand or at a definite time; and (4) be payable to order or to bearer. 2012) https://law.justia.com/cases/ohio/sixth-district-court-of-appeals/2012/wd-11-055.html, Failure to follow FHA guidelines as a Conditions Precedent, It has been held that a term in a mortgage such as one requiring prior notice of a default or acceleration to the mortgagor is not an affirmative defense but rather a condition precedent. (Compl. Corp., 2016-Ohio-3444, 76, 148 Ohio St. 3d 627, 650, 72 N.E.3d 573, 595 (Ohio S.Ct. Ct. 2005) https://casetext.com/case/monetary-v-pluchino, Unconscionable contracts, howeverwhether relating to arbitration or notare unenforceable under Texas law In re PolyAmerica, L. P., 262 S.W.3d 337, 348 (Tex.2008) https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/895041/in-re-poly-america-lp/, In Wisconsin, contract unconscionability has been codified in Wis. Stat. In this affidavit, the bank must state the amount due and owing on the mortgage loan. App. Ms. Boone's damage is that she paid Conseco and will lose her home if it can stand on its foreclosure. There is no person living who has personal knowledge of the transaction when consummated. Corp. v. Allstate, 838 P.2d 790, 793 n.5 (Alaska 1992) https://casetext.com/case/firemans-fund-mortg-corp-v-allstate, Mortgage contracts generally allow a servicerthe company that handles the loan accountto charge late fees, inspection fees, foreclosure costs, and other default-related fees to your account under certain circumstances, like when you are late on a payment or are in foreclosure. Ohio Rev.Code Ann. Thus, when an acknowledgment does not recite the name of the mortgagor, "the acknowledgment is defective." Nolan, 383 B.R. Your state's housing agency might have a foreclosure avoidance program as well. You'll want to look at any affidavit used in your foreclosure closely, including the figures in the affidavit, because the court will base its final judgment on those amounts. The process of challenging a foreclosure varies based on whether the foreclosure is judicial or non-judicial. However, the second mortgage soon came into default. In re Dow, 132 B.R. These are just some examples of possible defenses to a foreclosure. Be aware that the servicer generally doesn't have to review more than one loss mitigation application from you. The servicer assesses an incorrect late charge amount. https://www.leagle.com/decision/infdco20140121a04. 3d 625, 236 Cal.App.4th 394 (Cal. Sci. App. If it's later discovered that the information was false, and the matter ends up in court, a judge will give an affidavit greater evidentiary weight than after-the-fact trial testimony. 3d 704, 707. ", Warning has to appear on promissory note, guaranty, lease (doc that evidences indebtedness) directly above or below signature of party authorizing cognovit judgment, Distinct type size, appearing more clearly or conspicuously than anything else in document, Warning must be more "clear and conspicuous" than other parts of document, Has to comply strictly with all requirements of 2323.12(D) if not, Court does not have jurisdiction to enter cognovit judgment on instrument, If the amount in controversy is greater than $15K, can file in Court of Common Pleas with territorial jurisdiction over place where ANY obligor under warrant of attorney resides or where ANY obligor signed warrant of attorney (ORC 2323.13(A)), Obligor cannot waive venue/jurisdiction requirements of 2323.13(A) by signing cognovit instrument with contrary forum selection clause, Requirements for Complaint (Cognovit Complaint requirements for the most part are not enumerated specifically in the Rules of Civil Procedure/ORC), Statement of Plaintiffs Attorney setting forth Defendants Last known address ORC 2323.13(B), Statement that Warrant of Attorney did not arise out of Consumer Transaction/Consumer Loan, Where Plaintiff is an attorney must include statement that warrant of attorney did not arise out of attorney/client relationship to collect fees, This is a local rule from Cleveland Municipal Court Local Rule 6.07, Statement that original instrument containing warrant of attorney accompanies complaint, Allegation that cognovit instrument is in default and was accelerated by Plaintiff or instrument has matured, Statement of amount due on instrument and that Defendant has not paid amount to Plaintiff, Statement that Court has jurisdiction to render cognovit judgment against Defendant based on Defendants residency or location where defendant signed the warrant of attorney, Allegation that instrument contains warrant of attorney and warning set forth in ORC 2323.13(D), Other documents/allegations as required by local rule i.e. https://www.legalmatch.com/law-library/article/breach-of-contract-defenses-unclean-hands.html. Huntington Nat'l Bank v. Belcher 2012 Ohio 3731 (Ohio Ct. App. Fireman's Fund Mortg. Ct. 2016) https://casetext.com/case/bank-of-ny-mellon-v-rogers. In some cases, servicers charge borrowers late fees on full payments that were made on time because the borrower didnt include a payment for a previously unpaid late charge. Even in situations where the original note is available, the endorsements sometimes aren't in order, or an assignment might be missing. Recognition of these purposes has led to an analysis ofunconscionabilityin terms of "substantive" and "procedural"unconscionability. 17-224-DLB-CJS. R. Civ. Start here to find foreclosure lawyers near you. Bank of N.Y. Mellon v. Rogers, 407 Ill. Dec. 365, 378 (Ill. App. Co., 282 F.3d 407, 409 (6th Cir.2002) citing Restatement (Second) of Contracts 336, cmt.b (1981). MAZZEI EX REL. See, e.g., Staats v. Praegitzer,67 Or. It is established that co-tenants as co-obligers on a mortgage are indispensable parties. App. The servicer credited your payments to the wrong party, so you weren't, in fact, delinquent to the extent asserted. The confession shall operate as a release of errors. He represents borrowers facing foreclosure in Ohio at his law firm. 1944.34(k)(2), this court affirms thebankruptcycourt and holds that the current interest credit agreement reverts back to August 2, 1985 for the purposes of determining FmHA's claim amount. If your challenge is successful, the court will most likely dismiss the foreclosure, forcing the process to restart. 62 Exs. Hillsborough Rare Coins, LLC v. ADT LLC,No. 2001)https://casetext.com/case/associates-home-equity-services-v-troup As stated, what the Troups seek is a diminishment of the amount due based on Associates' violation of statutory fair housing and civil rights laws. The factors to be considered in determining whether a breach is material are: (a) the extent to which the injured party will be deprived of the benefit which he reasonably expected; (b) the extent to which the injured party can be adequately compensated for the part of that benefit of which he will be deprived; (c) the extent to which the party failing to perform or to offer to perform will suffer forfeiture; (d) the likelihood that the party failing to perform or to offer to perform will cure his failure, taking account of all the circumstances including any reasonable assurances; (e) the extent to which the behavior of the party failing to perform or to offer to perform comports with standards of good faith and fair dealing. 3d 625, 635 (Cal. In about half the states where foreclosures are judicial, which means the foreclosure is accomplished through a civil lawsuit, you automatically get a chance to tell your side of the story to a court by filing an answer to the suit. Nat'l Ass'n, 783 F.3d 1022 (5th Cir. See also Smith's Lessee v. Hunt, 13 Ohio 260, 269 (1844) (holding that court was unable to infer name of grantor when acknowledgment was blank as to the grantor and, thus, the mortgage was defective and did not convey title); Cala, 2008 WL 2001761 at *6 ("In order to properly certify an acknowledgment, the notary must provide some indication that the party actually appeared."). The Bank claimed Brothers interest in the property ended with the foreclosure action, while Brothers claimed its interest had not ended because it was not joined in the initial lawsuit. Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Howard Investment Corp. (1957), 105 Ohio App. 2016) https://casetext.com/case/caraccia-v-us-bank#p1279, Indeed, the prevailing rule is that, barring third-party beneficiary status, a litigant lacks standing to attack an assignment to which he or she is not a party." 1640, as a setoff,recoupmentor counterclaim, to a mortgageforeclosureaction. Affidavits and declarations are often a required part of the foreclosure process. Additionally, Defendants rushed the Feachers into signing the Contract without allowing them a reasonable opportunity to read and understand the Contract or obtain independent legal counsel. 1296 (2017)). Beneficial Fin. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. Royal Manor Apartments, LLC, 39 F. Supp. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Filing a Complaint Against Your Servicer With the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. Here, Bank's complaint was filed in 2013, based on an alleged default occurring on June 1, 2006.3Because trial counsel for the parties stipulated to the court that the facts were undisputed, with Bank's counsel additionally confirming that the sole determinative issue to resolve at trial was one of law, the court erred when it failed to dismiss the foreclosure complaint with prejudice based on a default that occurred out-side of the five-year statute of limitations period. A successful claim for "fraud on the court" can succeed only on proof of "the most egregious misconduct. 3d 464, 471 (Ohio Ct. App. Williams v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 504 F. Supp. Judgement in the foreclosure action favored the bank, the mortgages were foreclosed, a sheriffs sale was ordered, and the Bank purchased the property. In several documents prepared after the 1979 refinancing, PSFS, and later Meritor, continued to describe the general partners as being without personal liability. Ct. 2015) https://casetext.com/case/wells-fargo-bank-na-v-cook-2#p385, Wells Fargo also argues that even if it did not conduct a timely face-to-face meeting with the Cooks, such noncompliance would not as a matter of law render a foreclosure sale void, that a standard of less than strict compliance should be applied, and that summary judgment thus would still be appropriate. . Corp.,157 A.D.3d 1152, 1154-1155 [3d Dept 2018]) IMRIE v. RATTO 2019 NY Slip Op 50845(U) https://www.leagle.com/decision/innyco20190530464, Generally, the doctrine of promissory estoppel is applicable when a promise has been made, but there is no tangible consideration offered in return; instead, detrimental reliance acts as a substitute for actual consideration. 203.604(b). If this applies to your case, you need to talk to an attorney about possibly looking at a bankruptcy to wipe out the mortgage and get our client over $130,000 equity free and clear. If the loan servicer delays posting your payment to your account until after the grace period ends, it can also result in an improper late fee. Hartman v. Great Seneca Fin. In re Boates, CIVIL ACTION No. No. [5] https://www.investopedia.com/what-are-your-legal-rights-in-a-foreclosure-4846357, [6] https://law.justia.com/cases/new-jersey/appellate-division-unpublished/2016/a0837-14.html, [7] https://cases.justia.com/ohio/supreme-court-of-ohio/2003-ohio-3648.pdf. Mr. Lambert then appealed, and the judgement was reversed. Ct. App. Trying to decide whether to pursue a deed in lieu of foreclosure or a short sale? 2017) https://www.leagle.com/decision/inbco20170703560. In this way, you can go to the court and say, "This sale would have gone through with the buyer meeting all contingencies if the bank just accepted it." There is a difference between a spouse signing a mortgage to waive dowery versus signing a mortgage to encumber her property interest if on the deed. );Joseph v. PPG Indus.,674 S.W.2d 862, 867 (Tex. A claim for estoppel cannot survive when the plaintiff's actions were based on his own will and judgment rather than the defendant's representations. 09-15693 (MG), 118-19 (Bankr. The district court determined that the note was not a negotiable instrument and, therefore, that Ameritrust was not a holder in due course. R. BANKR. 05-4353 (E.D. 2d 873 (W.D. One way to attack a foreclosure is to argue that the foreclosing party does not have standing to foreclose. The HUD regulations require face-to-face meetings (24 C.F.R. When it comes to important decisions, relying on accurate information is essential. The limitations period for claims brought under Chapter 93A is four years. [2] https://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/ded/files/opinions/15-961.pdf, [4] https://www.ny-bankruptcy.com/necessary-parties-in-a-foreclosure/, [5] https://www.federalrulesofcivilprocedure.org/frcp/title-iv-parties/rule-19-required-joinder-of-parties/, [6] http://supremecourt.ohio.gov/LegalResources/Rules/civil/CivilProcedure.pdf, [7] https://www.findlaw.com/realestate/foreclosure/foreclosure-by-judicial-sale.html, [8] https://casetext.com/case/lambert-v-dracos, [9] https://law.justia.com/cases/kansas/court-of-appeals/1993/68-924.html, [10] https://law.justia.com/cases/nevada/supreme-court/1992/22246-1.html, The unclean hands doctrine, sometimes referred to as the "dirty hands" doctrine, is normally used when the person being accused of a breach argues that the other party should not be entitled to a remedy because they were also responsible for committing a breach. You may have a right to force a lender to pursue a judicial foreclosure instead of a non-judicial foreclosure if you took out your mortgage before going on active duty. U.S. BANK NAT. July 1, 2015)https://law.justia.com/cases/new-york/appellate-division-second-department/2015/2013-07197.html. BELOTE v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. The transfer of ownership notice must provide specific information, like the transfer date and the new creditor's identity. Nat'l Mortg. A foreclosure law expert cautions homeowners against a new foreclosure scam that requires a transfer of ownership in the home as part of the scam. 402.302, which states that under the Wisconsin U.C.C., "[i]f the court as a matter of law finds the contract or any clause of the contract to have been unconscionable at the time it was made the court may refuse to enforce the contract." IN RE FIRST PHOENIX-WESTON, LLC 575 B.R. The information provided on this site is not legal advice, does not constitute a lawyer referral service, and no attorney-client or confidential relationship is or will be formed by use of the site. We conclude that the settlement agreement was void as being totally unconscionable, both procedurally and substantively. The statute of limitations is an affirmative defense, C.R.C.P. Lemstone argued that Frenchtown failed to mitigate its damages by not reletting the property once Lemstone vacated. U.S. Bank, N.A. (2009).To prove these factual allegations, Pino explained that he had initiated discovery and that upon doing so he would move to dismiss the case for fraud on the court. Ct. App. In such a case, although no consideration or benefit accrues to the person making the promise, he is the author or promoter of the very condition of affairs which stands in his way; and when this plainly appears, it is most equitable that the court should say that they shall so stand. If the loan owner or servicer didn't follow state procedural requirements for bringing a foreclosure action, you could challenge the foreclosure. Basically, predatory lending is when a lender makes a loan to benefit the lender, not the borrower. Stores Natl. Ct. App. Be aware that virtually all judges overlook inconsequential errors, like the name misspelling. (12 C.F.R. 401, 867 A.2d 841 (Conn. App. 254, 778 A.2d 529 (N.J. Super. That requirement continues after recordation of a lien pursuant to Civil Code sections 5673 and 5675. Had HCTA accepted the check and applied it in the order prescribed by section 5655(a), the amount of delinquent assessments would have been less than $1,800. 2011) https://casetext.com/case/belanger-v-bac-home-loans-servicing-lp, "The doctrine of promissory estoppel may be invoked where it is `shown that the defendant made a clear and unambiguous promise upon which the plaintiff reasonably relied to his or her detriment' (Clifford R. Gray, Inc. v LeChase Constr. FEACHER v. HANLEY Case No. Fed. The error must be at least somewhat meaningful for a court to dismiss a case on procedural grounds. Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. 3:14-cv-686 (E.D. Cases involving unlimited and continuing personal guaranties: o Cinemack Corp. 10th Dist. 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure breaks down 23 powerful foreclosure defenses into easy-to-understand chapters. See Chakford v. Strum, 87 So.2d 419 (Fla. 1956); Manchester Insurance Indemnity Co. v. Novack, 284 So.2d 433 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973). The defendant claims in her fifth special defense that the plaintiff violated the doctrine of unclean hands and should be precluded from proceeding with the foreclosure action because the plaintiff did not offer her a permanent loan modification under the program despite the fact that, pursuant to regulations published by the United States Department of the Treasury, she was entitled to a permanent modification upon the completion of her three trial payments. Maryland Oil v. Kaminetz,260 Md. FEE-SPLIT CLASS v. MONEY STORE No. 2013) https://casetext.com/case/pfeifer-v-countrywide-home-loans-2, Mortgage Insurance Policy Pays Claim as Offset, A standard mortgagee clause in an insurance contract provides a mortgagee with much greater protection than a "simple" loss payee clause which merely designates the mortgagee as an alternative payee under the policy. (2009). If the foreclosure starts after the limitations period expires, and you raise this issue in front of a court, the court will dismiss the action. P. 60(d)(3). MENG v. DU Civil Action No. Recently, this court found that unclean hands is tantamount to "[u]nscrupulous practices, overreaching, concealment, trickery or other unconscientious conduct." LinkCo,367 F. App'x at 182. "[I]f the plaintiff shows good cause" for failing to timely effect service, "the court must extend the time for service for an appropriate period." This Court fails to understand why State Farm did not present this evidence initially in response to Plaintiff's suggestion that a sheriff's sale had occurred. Rptr. That time is ordinarily twenty years. 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure breaks down 23 powerful foreclosure defenses into easy-to-understand chapters. It was a proper holder in due course when it possessed the original note that was indorsed in blank. (12 C.F.R. #shorts #foreclosure #foreclosuredefense Order "23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure" by @TroyDoucet Click here: https://amzn.to/3CrrGY2***Also order "Art of War. 20 Civ. Claim # 2 does not attach evidence establishing Chase's standing as loan servicer or as the holder of the note and mortgage. In resolving a Civ.R. 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure: How to Beat the Bank - Troy Doucet - Google Books 23 Legal Defenses to Foreclosure breaks down 23 powerful foreclosure defenses into easy-to-understand. HICKS v. WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A. "Its purpose is to prevent a party from playing fast and loose with the courts and to protect the essential integrity of the judicial process. [O]ur courts have permitted several equitable defenses to a foreclosure action. Buy 23 Legal Defenses To Foreclosure 08 edition (9781438278193) by Doucet for up to 90% off at Textbooks.com. Ct. 382 (Mass. Va. 1994) https://casetext.com/case/bankers-trust-edva-delaware-v-236-beltway-inv. As a result, plaintiff's Chapter 93A claim based on the terms of the mortgage is time-barred. Bank (In re Nolan), 383 B.R. Thebankruptcy dischargeinjunction prohibited [Bank] from sending a HLPA notice; "[t]he requirements of HLPA, requiring notice to the debtor prior toforeclosureproceedings conflict with the federalbankruptcy dischargeinjunction" and, therefore, Bank "could not give the required state HLPA notice while also refraining from the facially impermissible actions with regard to thedischargeinjunction"; and Section 58-21A-6 is preempted by federalbankruptcylaw. Truth in Lending Act (TILA) Violations and Foreclosure. Elements to prove an account stated Dept. Failure to mitigate damages can be used as an affirmative defense. 11 U.S.C. By accelerating Harrison's loan and foreclosing on his home without providing the contractually required notice, U.S. Bank failed to do something fundamental to the contract and committed a material breach. Taylor v. First Resolution Invest. In re Cala, No. On appeal, our Supreme Court held that the assistant clerk had erred by applying res judicata principles because "[n]on-judicial foreclosureis not ajudicialaction."
William Barber Ii Rebecca Mclean Barber,
Veterinary Palpation Jacket,
Articles OTHER